Showing posts with label life force. Show all posts
Showing posts with label life force. Show all posts

Thursday, 28 February 2013

Dr. George Carlo talks about EMF Cell Phone Dangers


In 1993 eminent public health scientist, Dr George Carlo was hired by the cell phone industry to examine the health risk of cell phones.  This twenty five million dollar, seven year pivotal study was intended to prove that cell phones were safe.  Dr Carlo’s study was thorough and conclusive, proving just the opposite of what the cell phone companies wanted.  In fact, Carlo found a strong connection between cell phone use and brain tumours, neurological disease and genetic damage.  He say's, because we still don't know the true health risks that we must exercise caution.

Dr Carlo told us, "It's very similar to the problems we had with the tobacco industry, but the difference here is that in the United States, we have now two hundred and eight million people using cell phones.  Around the world, at last count, I think at last count, there were one point nine billion people using cellular or mobile phones.  So we've never had, ever in history before, penetration of a consumer product like this.  And because of the litigation ongoing in the United States the cell phone industry knows that they will lose a couple of these lawsuits and when they do, they are probably going to turn to the government for some kind of bailout.  So that the institutional arrogance they are exhibiting is born of the fact that so many people use cell phones, so much of retirement investment funds that are in place are tied to telecommunications stocks, they feel they are almost untouchable. So at the end of the day they feel that they're gonna have a government bailout here in the United States, that will probably follow them around the world."

When asked about this opinion on Disney and Sprint in the USA actively targeting children, he went on to say, "Well this is really grotesque.  We have companies like the Disney Corporation which built it's reputation on being friendly to kids who have partnered with Sprint here in the United States.  And in this partnership, Disney is not only selling phones but they are also a carrier of signals so that people who have the Disney phones would actually pay the Disney Corporation for the minutes.  And what is most grotesque about this is that they are targeting children between the ages of eight and twelve years old.  They have actually named them the 'tweener' market.  So we have not only this very gross marketing tactic aimed at children, but we also have the problem that the scientific studies, the epidemiological studies that have been done thus far are really studies of adults who have used the phone for 500 to 1000 minutes a month, maybe over a period of ten to twelve years.  And those studies are showing us a doubling or tripling in the risk of brain cancer and eye cancer.  When you start talking about a child, eight or nine years old beginning use, by the time they are nineteen to twenty years old, they will have used the phone for ten years, and we have no idea what type of risk that's carrying.  The projection that we do have indicate that we are putting these children in unbelievable danger.


But what have the studies told us about heavy phone usage in an adult population?  Dr Carlo told us, "the studies that have been published so far, studies that have been done in the mid 1990's and early 2000's.  So back then there wasn't such widespread use of cell phones.  And you're right, that's not a lot of time on the cell phone.  We did a study here in Buffalo, New York, where we looked at teenagers and their cell phone use patterns.  The average teenager in Buffalo uses his cell phone twenty six hundred minutes a month.  And the behaviour patterns are very different.  Many of these children leave their phones on at night and put them under their pillow, so that they can receive text messages from their class-mates during the night.  And this is the kind of thing that's unprecedented, we have no idea how to estimate how big the risk really is with this type of usage.

And finally, what is the science telling us of moderate users, only using fifteen to twenty minutes a day; what we would consider a typical adult usage?  He went on to say, "we have conducted or constructed epidemic curve projections based on the epidemiological studies that have been published to date, and what they tell us is that today there are between 30,000 and 50,000 new cases of brain and eye cancer attributable to cell phone use.  By the year 2010 the projections say that number is going to near 500,000 cases of brain and eye cancer every year attributable just to cell phone use.  Those numbers are unprecedented.  It's true that they are driven by the fact that in the world there are 1.9 billion people using cell phones, but we have never had this type of impending risk facing society.  It is unprecedented and I fear unprecedented in terms of the danger it represents".

Monday, 18 February 2013

Resonance: Beings of Frequency - A Documentary




RESONANCE is a sensational eye opening documentary which reveals the harm we are doing by existing in an ocean of man made wireless frequencies.
Two billion years ago life first arrived on this planet; a planet, which was filled with a natural frequency. As life slowly evolved, it did so surrounded by this frequency and Inevitably, it began tuning in.
By the time mankind arrived on earth an incredible relationship had begun; a relationship that science is only now beginning to understand.
Research is showing that being exposed to this frequency is absolutely integral to us. It controls our mental and physical health, it synchronizes our circadian rhythms, and it aids our immune system and improves our sense of well being.
Not only are we surrounded by natural frequencies, our bodies are filled with them too. Our cells communicate using electro-magnetic frequencies. Our brain emits a constant stream of frequencies and our DNA delivers instructions, using frequency waves. Without them we couldn’t exist.
This delicate balance has taken billions of years to perfect. But over the last 25 years the harmony has been disturbed. and disturbed dramatically.
Mankind has submerged itself in an ocean of artificial frequencies. They are all around us, filling the air and drowning out the earth’s natural resonance.
To the naked eye the planet appears to be the same. But at a cellular level it is the biggest change that life on earth has endured; the affects of which we are just starting to see and feel.

This documentary explores our bio resonance and it's place in the world.

A Scientific Meeting about EMF Exposure and Public Health - A Report

In November, 2009, a scientific panel met in Seletun, Norway, for three days of intensive discussion on existing scientific evidence and public health implications of the unprecedented global exposures to artificial electromagnetic fields (EMF). EMF exposures (static to 300 GHz) result from the use of electric power and from wireless telecommunications technologies for voice and data transmission, energy, security, military and radar use in weather and transportation.

The Scientific Panel recognizes that the body of evidence on EMF requires a new approach to protection of public health; the growth and development of the fetus, and of children; and argues for strong preventative actions. New, biologically-based public exposure standards are urgently needed to protect public health worldwide.  This is their report:

http://emfsafetynetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Seletun-Statement-2010.pdf

Bees, Birds and Mankind. Destroying Nature by ‘Electrosmog’

"Today, unprecedented exposure levels and intensities of magnetic, electric, and electromagnetic fields from numerous wireless technologies interfere with the natural information system and functioning of humans, animals, and plants. The consequences of this development, which have already been predicted by critics for many decades, cannot be ignored anymore. Bees and other insects vanish; birds avoid certain places and become disorientated at others. Humans suffer from functional impairments and diseases. And insofar as the latter are hereditary, they will be passed on to next generations as pre-existing defects"  Ulrich Warnke

The full Report is here: http://www.kompetenzinitiative.net/assets/ki_beesbirdsandmankind_screen.pdf

An EBEA Report into the Exposure to high frequency electromagnetic fields, biological effects and health consequences (100 kHz-300 GHz)

This is a review of the scientific evidence on dosimetry, biological effects, epidemiological observations, and health consequences concerning exposure to high frequency electromagnetic fields.  ICNIRP was established to advance non-ionizing radiation protection for the benefit of people and the environment.

ICNIRP is a non-governmental organization in non-ionizing radiation in formal relations with the World Health Organization and the International Labour Office. It maintains a close liaison and working relationship with all international bodies engaged in the field of non-ionizing radiation protection, and interacts with radiation protection professionals worldwide through its close collaboration with the International Radiation Protection Association and its national societies.


Work is conducted in four standing committees - on Epidemiology, Biology, Physics and Optical Radiation - and in conjunction with appropriate international and national health and research organizations as well as universities and other academic institutions.

This is a link to a European BioElectromagnetics Association (EBEA) article about the Exposure to high frequency electromagnetic fields, biological effects and health consequences (100 kHz-300 GHz).

http://www.ebea.org/pdf/sc_docs/reviews/RFReview.pdf

What is the International EMF Project?

What is the International EMF Project?

Background

Potential health effects of exposure to static and time varying electric and magnetic fields need scientific clarification. Electromagnetic fields of all frequencies represent one of the most common and fastest growing environmental influences, about which there is anxiety and speculation are spreading. EMF exposure now occurs to varying degrees to all populations of the world, and the levels will continue to increase with advancing technology. Thus, even a small health consequence from EMF exposure could have a major public health impact.
Concerns have been expressed that exposure to extremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic fields at power frequencies (50/60 Hz) could lead to an increased incidence of cancer in children and other adverse health effects. The evidence comes primarily from residential epidemiological studies. These studies suggest that children exposed to ELF magnetic fields have an associated increased risk of leukaemia.
Radio frequency (RF) fields are used to great benefits in many facets of everyday life, such as radio and TV transmission, telecommunications (eg mobile telephones), diagnosis and treatments of disease and in industry for heating and sealing materials. With the rapid introduction of mobile telecommunications devices, especially among the general public, there has been a focus on the problems associated with near field RF exposure to the head from the small radiating antenna of mobile phones. In addition, concerns persist that exposure to pulsed and amplitude modulated RF fields may cause specific health effects.
As societies develop, greater use of certain technologies leads to increasing exposure to static electric and magnetic fields. This is especially the case in industry, transport, power transmission, research and medicine. Possible health effects from static fields have never been properly assessed. Given the rapid expansion of medical devices and imminent introduction, potentially on a large scale, of magnetic levitation transport systems that use strong static magnetic fields, any health impacts need to be properly assessed.
As part of its charter to protect public health and in response to public concern over health effects of EMF exposure, the World Health Organization (WHO) established the International EMF Project in 1996 to assess the scientific evidence of possible health effects of EMF in the frequency range from 0 to 300 GHz. The EMF Project encourages focused research to fill important gaps in knowledge and to facilitate the development of internationally acceptable standards limiting EMF exposure.

Project objectives

Key objectives of the Project are to:
  • provide a coordinated international response to concerns about possible health effects of exposure to EMF,
  • assess the scientific literature and make a status report on health effects,
  • identify gaps in knowledge needing further research to make better health risk assessments,
  • encourage a focused research programme in conjunction with funding agencies,
  • incorporate the research results into WHO's Environmental Health Criteria monographs where formal health risk assessments will be made on exposure to EMF,
  • facilitate the development of internationally acceptable standards for EMF exposure,
  • provide information on the management of EMF protection programmes for national and other authorities, including monographs on EMF risk perception, communication and management, and
  • provide advice to national authorities, other institutions, the general public and workers, about any hazards resulting from EMF exposure and any needed mitigation measures.

Project activities

The mandate of the the International EMF Project is to assess the health and environmental effects of exposure to static and time varying electric and magnetic fields in the frequency range 0 - 300 GHz. For the purposes of the EMF Project, this range is divided into: static (0 Hz), extremely low frequency (ELF, >0-300 kHz), intermediate frequencies (IF, >300Hz to 10MHz), and radiofrequency (RF, 10 MHz-300 GHz) fields.
The EMF Project is located at the World Health Organization (WHO) headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland, since this is the only United Nations organization with a clear mandate to investigate detrimental health effects from exposure of people to non-ionizing radiation. The project is part of the Department of Public Health and Environment (PHE) in the Health Security and Environment (HSE) cluster.

United Kingdom Contact Details

Department of Health

Contact name:
Mr Stuart Conney
Organization/address:
Department of Health
Legislation and Environmental Hazards
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London, SE1 8UG
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0) 207 972 4179
Fax: +44 (0) 207 972 1244
Email: stuart.conney@dh.gsi.gov.uk

Health & Safety Executive

Contact name:
J Arwel Barrett
HM Principal Specialist Inspector
Organization/address:
Corporate Specialist Division Radiation Team
HSE
Bldg 4N3 Redgrave Court
Merton Road
Bootle. L20 7HS
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0)151 951 4819
Fax: +44 (0)151 951 4845
Email: arwel.barrett@hse.gsi.gov.uk

Health Protection Agency - Radiation Protection Division

Contact name:
Dr Simon Mann
Organization/address:
Health Protection Agency
Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards
Chilton, Didcot
Oxfordshire
OX11 0RQ
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0)1235 831600
Fax: +44 (0)1235 833891
Email: simon.mann@hpa.org.uk 
Web site: http://www.hpa.org.uk/radiation/

Measuring Wireless Radiation

Measuring Wireless Radiation

To be really empowered when it comes to electromagnetic fields one has to learn to measure the location with a meter or detector. Otherwise, one is guessing what the exposures might be.

The very best way to measure would be with a microwave ‘spectrum analyzer’ that can tell you what your exposures are, with specificity regarding the exact frequencies present. A spectrum analyzer can cost tens of thousands of dollars so they are mostly used in industry and government. It is not a practical tool for most consumers, nor is it necessary. Instead, meters that measure composite power density are used, without the specific details of what frequencies are present. It is a very rare case when a spectrum analyzer will need to be brought in to identify and resolve a problem.

For the layman, the basic Electrosmog Meter is a handy choice for both detecting and measuring radiation in the lower end of the microwave band where cell towers transmit. Its bandwidth (range: 50MHz to 3.5 GHz) is too high to detect AM radio or amateur radio (except VHF and higher frequencies), and too low to detect 5.8 GHz cordless phones, radar, and higher frequency microwave transmissions. But it will detect cell phone, cell towers, TV, and FM radio transmissions, as well as microwave ovens.

A step up from the basic Electrosmog Meter is the newer 8 Gigahertz Electrosmog Meter that runs about $500. The advantage over the basic meter is it will pick up a much broader range of exposures, including portable phones on the high end as well as some new forms of Wi-Fi that operate at 5 Gigahertz (most are at 2.4 Gigahertz). The meter’s range is 10 MHz to 8 Ghz.

Several experts have compared the Electrosmog Meters with far more expensive European meters that run into the thousands of dollars, and find the Electrosmog Meters to be comparable, thus they are a real value in making microwave radiation measurement affordable to larger audiences.

The meters are fairly user-friendly once one is walked through the basics of how to use it.  We are confident school personnel can learn to use these meters if given a scale for a frame of reference in order to understand what the readings mean. There are several units of measurement to choose from. I personally use ‘microwatts per meter squared’ unit of measurement on the meter so I can compare the readings obtained with the scale prepared by the Institute for Bau Biologie & Ecology.

Many experts do not recommend the popular Trifield Meter for microwave measurements, although note the Trifield is considered very reliable for magnetic field measurements (except in high RF environments). When it comes to RF meters in particular, its best to buy a brand trusted by experts who use these meters in the course of their daily life and understand their reliability and quirks.

Detecting vs. Measuring

For simply detecting radio frequency radiation, instead of measuring it, an excellent meter is the Zapchecker 185, www.zapchecker.com. The Zapchecker, though only displaying relative readings, is highly sensitive and was developed for security personnel to detect hidden bugs and cameras. Its range is far broader than the TES-92 Electrosmog Meter. It also has a vibrate mode for undercover detection. Its very fast analog needle display and blinking LED light make EMF detection obvious and easy. For simply finding RF or MW sources so one can know to shield oneself from these sources it is a highly sensitive, excellent choice.

The Cheapest Way of Detecting Radiofrequency

It is possible to use a portable AM radio to detect some RF sources. First turn the radio dial between stations where there is no radio signal. Move about, and turn the radio antenna in all directions. When you hear static this means there is a source of radiofrequency present. As an experiment, place the AM radio near a Compact Fluorescent Bulb and listen to what happens. Next check out what happens near an operating cell phone or other items with a low frequency and high electric field. An AM radio can be a useful initial screen when no meters are available, but note it won’t pick up all sources, such as Wi-Fi, which is too high a frequency and not a strong enough electric field. Nonetheless, a simple inexpensive AM radio can be a good initial scout for microwave and RF fields on a low budget.

Thursday, 7 February 2013

Australian Schools: Stop Exposing Children to Radiation from WiFi and 3G until long-term exposure is proven harmless

Why this is important
Australian school children are facing a massive health crisis if the government and education authorities continue to ignore the warnings on the potential long-term health effects from chronic exposure to electromagnetic radiation (EMR) from WiFi and 3G internet.
In 2011 the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), classified this form of electromagnetic radiation as “possibly carcinogenic” - wireless technologies are now considered as a possible cancer causing agent.
In Australian schools children are being involuntarily exposed to low-intensity radiation for 6 hours a day, 5 days a week. This is unacceptable as there are safer wired options.
Many scientists and medical experts warn that environmental exposure to man-made EMR interferes with the body’s internal bioelectrical signals which may lead to "loss of wellbeing, disease and even death." (BioInitiative Report 2012)
There are no specific scientific studies on the long-term health effects of WiFi on children, yet this technology is being vigorously rolled out in schools without parental consent.
Based on the overall scientific evidence of harm, the Council of Europe have called for a ban on WiFi use in schools and urge governments to act swiftly.Some responsible governments and authorities overseas have banned or warned against WiFi use in schools. They have taken the precautionary approach in order to minimise children’s exposure to wireless radiation.
We need to urgently send a strong message to the Australian government urging them to do the same, and to put children’s health ahead of convenience and short term profits.
With each passing day of government inaction Australian children are increasingly exposed to the potential long-term health effects from EMR.Children are also most vulnerable as they absorb more radiation due to their thinner skulls, bones and developing cells.
Even the Australian Radiation Protection Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) states "research relating to children is limited and the possibility of harm cannot be completely ruled out."
Just like the case with smoking, the possibility of illness manifesting may not be known until after years of chronic, low-level exposure to wireless radiation. It could take another 15-20 years before we have conclusive scientific proof
As the debate intensifies between pro-industry experts and independent groups of scientists about evidence of biological harm, the fact remains that this convenient, yet untested wireless technology has not been proven to be harmless for long-term use.
Given the recent WHO reclassification and the overall scientific evidence of harm,we need to act now before the damage proves to be extensive and irreversible to our children and future generations.
Let’s urgently raise our voices and build an unprecedented petition calling on the Australian government to take an immediate precautionary approach to reduce children’s exposure to wireless radiation.
Stop the use of WiFi and 3G internet in schools until conclusive evidence proves low intensity, long-term exposure to be harmless.
Please sign this urgent petition and share it widely.
For the facts on WiFi in schools and scientific evidence go to www.wifi-in-schools-australia.org

Source:
http://www.avaaz.org/en/petition/Australian_schools_Stop_Exposing_Children_to_Radiation_from_WiFi_and_3G_until_longterm_exposure_is_proven_harmless/?cQGgTdb

Thursday, 31 January 2013

EMF: How close is too close?



E.M.F. Three little letters that strike terror into many hearts, but why?

Donna Shay, a Colorado citizen, asked Western to conduct an electric and magnetic field reading at her cabin that sits just outside a 115-kilovolt transmission line’s right-of-way. EMF readings determined about 1 milliGauss of exposure near her front door.

Mostly, it’s because we don’t understand electric and magnetic fields, or EMF.

The truth is people come into contact with these fields every day. EMFs occur naturally, like the magnetic field caused by currents deep inside Earth’s molten core. Manmade fields are also created by common appliances and equipment we depend on every day, like talking on a cell phone or heating up lunch in a microwave

At Western, our high-voltage transmission lines and substations give off EMF, which sometimes concerns landowners with lines over and near their property. To help allay concerns, Western’s electrical engineers will test landowners’ EMF exposures from our transmission lines on request. Rocky Mountain Electrical Engineer Ron Padget is one such engineer who helps landowners determine the EMF exposure on their property. “They’ve heard about EMF, but they don’t know what it is,” he said. “So when I do a reading of their property, I let them know the physics of [EMF] and the fact that we don’t know if it’s dangerous or not.

In fact, there is no official accepted “safe level” for EMF exposure; there is still considerable controversy and uncertainty surrounding the risks and long-term effects of EMF, but many sources defer to 1 milligauss.

There is also an important distinction between magnetic and electrical fields. Padgett explained, “Research shows electrical fields don’t have a harmful effect on humans, but researchers are still looking at the effects of magnetic fields.”
Electrical fields versus magnetic fields: What’s the difference?
Electric FieldMagnetic Field
Produced by voltage (amount of energy)Produced by current (flow of energy)
Easily shielded (weakened)Not easily shielded (weakened)
Measured in volts per meter (V/m)Measured in milliGauss (mG)
The World Health Organization is also conducting long-term studies into the effects of EMF, and you can learn more about EMF at the WHO’s EMF Project website.
Go the distance
To reduce exposure to EMF, distance is the key.
“While magnetic fields are not easily shielded by objects or barriers like walls, roofs and trees; the exposure drops significantly the farther you are from the source creating EMF,” said Padget. “It’s the inverse of the square rule. If you’re twice as far away from the source (like a transmission line) you only get a quarter of the exposure; it drops off very quickly.”
For example, if your exposure standing directly under a 230-kilovolt transmission line is 64 mG, then when you walk 52 feet away your exposure is only 16 mG; and if you stand 116 feet away then your exposure is only 4 mG.
Common EMF sources
  • Electric blankets: Topping the list for worst EMF exposure is electric blankets because although the output is small, their close proximity to people increases EMF exposure. You’re unlikely to cuddle with your hairdryer or nap under a transmission line.
  • Wireless electronics (cell phones, etc)
  • Power Lines
  • TVs and computers
  • Electric clocks
  • Hairdryers
  • Electric razors
  • Kitchen appliances
Check out other EMF sources and their exposure levels at the Environmental Protection Agency’s “EMF in Your Environment” booklet.
Prudent avoidance
While you can’t prevent EMF, you can limit your exposure by using what what the EPA calls “prudent avoidance.” In addition to not wrapping up in a plugged-in electric blanket, you might:
  • Move your motor-driven electric clocks or other electrical devices (like cell phones) away from your bed.
  • Stand away from an operating microwave oven or other appliances that use a lot of electricity.
  • Sit away from the TV and at least an arm’s length away from the computer screen and processing unit.
  • Decide to use a safety razor instead of an electric one.

Tuesday, 22 January 2013

Protect Your Children From Cellphone Radiation

How Can You protect your Children?

In a new report published this week, John Wargo, Ph.D. professor of Environmental Risk and Policy at Yale University, lead author of the report said, “The scientific evidence is sufficiently robust showing that cellular devices pose significant health risks to children and pregnant women.”
Studies show that the developing organs of a child, lower bone density of the skull, lower body weight, and a less effective blood brain barrier make  children particularly vulnerable to the effects of cell phone radiation (de Salles 2006; Gandhi 1996; Kang 2002; Wang 2003; Wiart 2008). Other studies show there is also the risk of a longer lifetime of exposure compounding the effects.  The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) came to the conclusion that EMF’s could be possibly carcinogenic, which was then adopted as a World Health Organization recommendation. There is also a risk of induction and progression of cancer in children who are exposed to carcinogenic agents.  A 2008 study in Denmark revealed that 54% of children born of mothers who were cell phone users had behavioral issues. If the children grew up to be frequent cell phone users, that percentage rose to 80%.

How Can You protect your Children?

EMFs cannot be eliminated but exposures can be minimized.  Here are some practical tips to get you started:

1. Discourage unnecessary use of cell phones

Use of mobile phones exposes the tissue adjacent to the antenna to levels of EMF much higher than you would normally encounter even at a base station. Discourage your kids from using mobile phones unless it is absolutely necessary. Explain to them so that they can fully understand the dangers. Encourage them to use a hardwired phone connection whilst in the house and to prefer texting when out of the house.

2. Make their bedroom a low EMF zone

Night time is especially important for children because their cells regenerate and repair. EMFs are particularly harmful at night because they affect this necessary function. Switch off all electronic equipment and unplug them from the sockets. Keep all cell phones off and out of kids’ bedrooms during the night. Assess your kid’s room; an inexpensive gaussmeter can be useful for this. If an electronic gadgets can can be used outside the bedroom, move it to another room.

3. Beware of the dangers in your kitchen

Although the exposure is short-term in most cases, the kitchen is a high EMF area due to the number of devices. The worst culprit is invariably the microwave oven. Avoid using your microwave when your kids are nearby. Electric cookers, dishwashers and mixers can also give off fairly high levels of EMFs.

4. Prefer low EMF lighting

Generally throughout the home, but particularly in your children’s bedroom, replace compact fluorescent lightbulbs (CFLs) with light emitting diodes (LEDs). LEDs do not emit dangerous UV light and are less dangerous because they do not contain mercury.

5. Avoid Wireless Video Games

Wireless video games like the Nintendo Wii and the Sony Playstation operate using Bluetooth emit radiation. Choose wired versions where possible.
The basic principle of healthy living is to create a safe environment. Make sure you include exposure to EMFs when determining what is safe. As parents, you owe your children the right of protection. This includes protection from EMFs. Ignorance is not bliss. Our homes can be healthy in an EMF way, and that choice belongs to us parents. You have your chance: Make it count!
Huge thanks to Lloyd Burrell for the information in this article.

Electromagnetic Radiation Dangers: EMF Risks to Human Health



Electromagnetic radiation dangers are the subject of a great deal of controversy. Also referred to as electromagnetic field radiation (EMF), this type of radiation is non-ionizing, and not the same as the ionizing radioactivity from radioactive isotopes and X-rays that can break chemical bonds and destroy tissue. It is a safer form of radiation that emanates from power lines, substations, transformers, home wiring and even cell phones

However, 'safer' does not mean 'safe', and while experts agree that there is a hazard, the potential for this hazard to cause harm, or the risk to human health, is subject to discussion. So what is actually agreed and not agreed. And are electromagnetic radiation dangers something to worry about or not? Symptoms of EMF Exposure can include nausea, vomiting, confusion, headache and a general feeling of being unwell. Some report mild tinnitus while others report tiredness. However, among the more serious conditions reported and studied are damage to the retina and nervous system, muscle spasms, brain tumors, leukemia and miscarriage.

According to Dr. D. Carpenter of the School of Public Health, State University of New York, probably up to 30% of all childhood cancers arise from exposure to electromagnetic fields. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, it would be prudent to avoid electromagnetic fields. It is believed that this could be partially due to the EMF weakening the barrier between the brain and the blood, thus enabling toxins to enter the brain.

Thursday, 17 January 2013

EMF Frequencies Beyond Human Tolerance

The Health Issues Created by the Wireless Internet

When wireless internet first came into use, I was very concerned. Although they said that “scientifically” the frequencies emitted by “wifi” are harmless, the frequencies still batter the human energy field on a continuous, 24/7 basis. Such constant bombardment weakens our energy field, and creates physical problems over time, such as headaches, sleeplessness, irritability, depression, and immune system disorders. I was very skeptical of the diagnosis of “harmless.”

I began to study wifi, and intuitively “measure” the energy in whatever space the wifi network was active. I found that the unnatural frequencies of wifi actually lower the “life energy level” or life force of whatever space they are in by about 85%. So, if wifi frequencies are being broadcast in your favorite parks or campgrounds, your pleasurable experience of being in nature is being drastically altered and diminished.

It’s one thing to be bombarded by one wifi network. I don’t recommend the experience. However, a friend of mine who lives in a three flat building in a residential area surrounded by single family homes in Chicago. She just informed me that she discovered the presence of SIXTEEN different wifi networks running through her office space and apartment. I’m sorry folks, but this is WAY BEYOND what any human being should have to endure. Frankly, it is insane.

I am willing to bet that there are a ridiculously high number of people around the country—all of whom are experiencing such constant bombardment by damaging high-tech frequencies—who think they must be losing their mind. They have no clue as to the source, since the frequencies are essentially “invisible.”

They can’t think straight, they feel exhausted all the time, and they can’t understand why they feel so depressed. I’m willing to bet that more and more people are turning to anti-depression or other kinds of medications to help cope with their lives. At least in Germany they have started to question the health implications of wifi and are pulling it out of various establishments, including schools. Of course in this country, more and more people are using wifi, totally clueless of any potential long-term health risks.

I have created a healing solution to this problem—the Rejuvenizer— but people need to know that a problem exists!!!! Without being aware of the problem, it is unlikely they will search for a solution. Please share this information with your friends and loved ones. You may save a life—mentally, emotionally, and even physically.

Source: