Exposing the health risks of EMF radiation. In our modern world a surprising number of our modern devises give off harmful radiation this ranges from mobile phones to smart meters. The emf-risk blog helps to give you and your family advance and information regarding the dangers surrounding this issue
Showing posts with label Wireless technology; Brain cancer;. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wireless technology; Brain cancer;. Show all posts
This is a fascinating interview with Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt
PhD about Smart Meters and "EMR - The Health Crisis of our Time".
Dr. Klinghardt refers to EMR as the catalyst of many diseases of our
generation, from Autism to Fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome - all
exacerbated by the wireless revolution.
"Based upon a study of 10 autistic cases and 10 normal
cases, the pregnant mothers who gave birth to autistic children slept in a
location in which microwave radiation was 20.7x HIGHER, on average, than
pregnant mothers who gave birth to non-autistic children."
Dr. Magda Havas simplifies the engineering behind Electro Magnetic Fields and dispels the myths of safety that have been misleadingly created by our Governments and Technology experts.
Dr. Havas is an associate professor of Environmental & Resource Studies at Trent University where she teaches and does research on the biological effects of environmental contaminants. Her research deals with the health effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic energy at the extremely low frequency range associated with electricity (60 Hertz) and at the radio frequency range commonly associated with wireless telecommunication. Dr. Havas is particularly interested in monitoring exposure of the population in urban centres to radio frequency radiation and power-frequency fields. She is the author of numerous works on the subject. She received her Ph.D. from the University of Toronto, completed Post-Doctoral research at Cornell University, and taught at the University of Toronto before going to Trent University in Peterborough, Canada. Source: http://www.emftransformation.com/
In the current day
and age, almost everyone is running around with an Apple product hanging at
their hip. Be it the “Brand new” iPhone, or the latest incarnation of iPod, or
the top of the line iPad. Apple has been proclaiming itself the greatest
innovator in the world for years, but the important question is, “How safe are
their products?”
To measure the
amount of ambient radiation an object produces, we need to use a RF meter,
which scans a nearby area to determine how many Microwatts of radiation are being
generated per square metre. For a more educated estimation of the dangers being
posed by these machines, I should explain in deeper detail the danger levels
related to microwatts/m2.
Less than 0.10 microwatts/m2 provide no risk
of danger, or concern as cosmic background radiation (Of which we are all
affected) remains in these levels.
0.10-10 microwatts/m2 is of slight
concern, authorities in the field of radiation recommend that sleeping
areas be kept below 10 microwatts/m2 for the safety of the
occupants.
10 – 1000 microwatts/m2Can be considered a risk to health,
with 100 microwatts/m2falling
into the average scale for living areas within a home and the proposed
safety limit for Europe, levels higher than this considered hazardous to
human cells.
More than 1000 microwatts/m2 is an incredibly
dangerous amount of ambient radiation, a minimum of ten times the maximum
safe human limit.
With these base
danger levels established, we can begin the test to see the average microwatts/m2 output of
several apple products.
Apple iPhone:
The ambient
Microwatts/m2 level of the iPhone being used in this test, is 14.8, placing it
in an area of slight concern, not however, in immediate danger, keep in mind
that this level will also be affected by the ambient Microwatts/m2 of the room.
Upon turning the devices Wifi on however, the levels jumped sporadically, increasing
in bursts every few seconds. At this point, the lowest level displayed was 1.092,
which was periodically lower than the phones average ambient Microwatts/m2,
however this low level lasted less than a few seconds before leaping up into
the hundreds. Within the first few second of turning the Wifi on, the
Microwatts/m2 registered at 853.0, more than 8 times the maximum safe limit! Topping
off at 990.7 Microwatts/m2, the iPhone proves to be a highly dangerous device.
In call, the Microwatts/m2
will tend towards the upper scale of 1000, keeping in mind that when in call,
many people will hold their phone close to their head, which can and will cause
the cells in your cranial cavity to rapidly heat, causing untold damage.
Apple IPod:
Being the same device
as an iPhone, simply lacking the apparatus needed to make or receive phone
calls, the iPod output similar Microwatts/m2 levels. When the Wifi is switched
on, the iPod began to generate dangerous amounts of radiation, causing cells nearby
to heat in a similar fashion to the iPhone. However, there is a single defining
factor that divides the iPod from the iPhone, location. Traditionally, the iPod
spends far more time in ones pocket than the iPhone, seeming as the default
setting of the iPods Wifi is ON, the device is sending out levels of Microwatts/m2
measuring in the hundreds constantly, whilst affecting the entire mid section
of the carrier, ranging from the stomach to the genitals.
Apple iPad:
At the start of the
test you can see the iPad is producing no ambient Radiation level, a good sign
to start the test on. As the device is switched on, the Radiation level slowly increases;
however, it does so within safe levels. The iPads Microwatts/m2 levels reach
their highest at 33.30, far below the maximum safe levels for Human use. This
does comfortably place the iPad as the safest of the three devices being used
on a regular basis, which in my mind, is a surprise as I personally expected
the iPad to be generating the highest ambient radiation level, but this is a
good show of an uneducated guess being highly inaccurate.
After thoughts:
After running a test on
each, we can safely judge in the inbuilt risks of using these devices, with
each kicking a significant amount of radiation out, with the iPhone generating
a truly dangerous level of ambient radiation. Whilst it is known that all phone
companies, (Apple included) package each phone with a small safety leaflet that
roughly states “When the device is in use, hold at least four inches from the
head”. This demonstrates the company is aware of the innate risks a mobile
phone produces; yet, even holding the device a few inches from the head is not
enough, as the measurement “Microwatts/m2” demonstrates, these devices project
Radiation waves with a radius of at least a squared meter.
In the end, I can
answer the question I posed myself and you, the reader, at the beginning of
this article. “Are Apple products safe?” the answer being, on the whole, No.
The iPhone product, is
the most sold device that Apple produces, also making up 70% of all owned
mobile phones, with roughly 2100000000 calls being made daily across the world on
them. Each and every call generating dangerous levels of radiation for an average
time of 3 minutes and 15 seconds each time, so it is evident the amount of
damage that is being done.
My personal
recommendation, if you must own an Apple product, try and keep to the iPad, as
it is simply the safest of each device.
Although, to be fair to
Apple, it is not just them producing mobiles and other devices that produce exceedingly
dangerous levels of radiation, all mobile companies produce this cloud of
radiation that is damaging us, and none of them seem to making much of an
effort to minimize the radiation levels that currently plague our world.
I hope that this
article has been of use and will help guide you to a slightly cleaner,
Radiation free lifestyle.
In 1993 eminent public health scientist, Dr George Carlo was hired by the cell phone industry to examine the health risk of cell phones. This twenty five million dollar, seven year pivotal study was intended to prove that cell phones were safe. Dr Carlo’s study was thorough and conclusive, proving just the opposite of what the cell phone companies wanted.In fact, Carlo found a strong connection between cell phone use and brain tumours, neurological disease and genetic damage. He say's, because we still don't know the true health risks that we must exercise caution. Dr Carlo told us, "It's very similar to the problems we had with the tobacco industry, but the difference here is that in the United States, we have now two hundred and eight million people using cell phones. Around the world, at last count, I think at last count, there were one point nine billion people using cellular or mobile phones. So we've never had, ever in history before, penetration of a consumer product like this. And because of the litigation ongoing in the United States the cell phone industry knows that they will lose a couple of these lawsuits and when they do, they are probably going to turn to the government for some kind of bailout. So that the institutional arrogance they are exhibiting is born of the fact that so many people use cell phones, so much of retirement investment funds that are in place are tied to telecommunications stocks, they feel they are almost untouchable. So at the end of the day they feel that they're gonna have a government bailout here in the United States, that will probably follow them around the world." When asked about this opinion on Disney and Sprint in the USA actively targeting children, he went on to say, "Well this is really grotesque. We have companies like the Disney Corporation which built it's reputation on being friendly to kids who have partnered with Sprint here in the United States. And in this partnership, Disney is not only selling phones but they are also a carrier of signals so that people who have the Disney phones would actually pay the Disney Corporation for the minutes. And what is most grotesque about this is that they are targeting children between the ages of eight and twelve years old. They have actually named them the 'tweener' market. So we have not only this very gross marketing tactic aimed at children, but we also have the problem that the scientific studies, the epidemiological studies that have been done thus far are really studies of adults who have used the phone for 500 to 1000 minutes a month, maybe over a period of ten to twelve years. And those studies are showing us a doubling or tripling in the risk of brain cancer and eye cancer. When you start talking about a child, eight or nine years old beginning use, by the time they are nineteen to twenty years old, they will have used the phone for ten years, and we have no idea what type of risk that's carrying. The projection that we do have indicate that we are putting these children in unbelievable danger.
But what have the studies told us about heavy phone usage in an adult population? Dr Carlo told us, "the studies that have been published so far, studies that have been done in the mid 1990's and early 2000's. So back then there wasn't such widespread use of cell phones. And you're right, that's not a lot of time on the cell phone. We did a study here in Buffalo, New York, where we looked at teenagers and their cell phone use patterns. The average teenager in Buffalo uses his cell phone twenty six hundred minutes a month. And the behaviour patterns are very different. Many of these children leave their phones on at night and put them under their pillow, so that they can receive text messages from their class-mates during the night. And this is the kind of thing that's unprecedented, we have no idea how to estimate how big the risk really is with this type of usage. And finally, what is the science telling us of moderate users, only using fifteen to twenty minutes a day; what we would consider a typical adult usage? He went on to say, "we have conducted or constructed epidemic curve projections based on the epidemiological studies that have been published to date, and what they tell us is that today there are between 30,000 and 50,000 new cases of brain and eye cancer attributable to cell phone use. By the year 2010 the projections say that number is going to near 500,000 cases of brain and eye cancer every year attributable just to cell phone use. Those numbers are unprecedented. It's true that they are driven by the fact that in the world there are 1.9 billion people using cell phones, but we have never had this type of impending risk facing society. It is unprecedented and I fear unprecedented in terms of the danger it represents".
In 1903 Madame
Curie won the Nobel prize for her pioneering work on radioactivity, which she
mistakenly considered harmless to humans.
We now know that her premature death from a rare blood disease was
directly related to her exposure to radiation. Lead was a common
ingredient in house paint and other house-hold items until scientists fully
understood the deadly effects of lead poisoning. Until the 1980’s
the US Federal Government was reluctant to stand up to the powerful tobacco
industry even though millions had died of smoking related diseases.
Let’s face it, some
times we’re slow to recognize danger when its not painfully obvious. And the government is reluctant to take
action even after the danger has been exposed.
Unfortunately, many
people suffer and die before we eventually get around to dealing with many
potential risks. And in spite of the
fact we have curtailed smoking, regulated harmful pesticides in agriculture,
reduced the kinds of chemicals we use in food and household products, decreased
dangerous toxins that pollute our air, many diseases are on the rise, including
Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s and some forms of cancer. Why?
Well many
scientists believe we’re under assault by another form of pollution we may have
underestimated. Invisible, odourless,
silent and potentially deadly, this form of pollution is everywhere. You can’t escape
it. EMF’s or Electro Magnetic
Frequencies are produced by most electrical devices, appliances and the high
voltage power lines that surround us. Electro
magnetic radiation emitted by most wireless devices and microwaves, the same
energy frequencies we use to cook food in microwave ovens.
But your microwave
oven isn’t the only source of pulsing microwave radiation that assaults you
every minute of every day. Television,
telephone and computer signals are transmitted by microwaves. Even some automatic garage door openers use
microwaves to operate. Some
environmentalists call this proliferation of EMF’s, electro pollution. And United States agency warns that the
levels Americans are exposed to every day, without even being aware of it, may
be dangerous.
The fact is, you,
your loved ones, you children, are exposed to one hundred million times more
EMF’s and microwaves than your grandparents. And now, one source
of electro-pollution has become an increasingly integral part of our lives.Up close and personal; the cell phone.
In 1993 the first
lawsuit was filed against the cell phone industry by a man who claimed his
wife’s brain tumour was caused by cell phone use; a brain tumour shaped exactly
like the cell phone antenna. The
resulting publicity prompted the cell phone industry to fund a twenty five
million dollar study to prove that cell phones were safe. They hired Dr George Carlo, a highly respected
public health scientist to conduct the research.Dr Carlo’s study was thorough and conclusive,
proving just the opposite of what the cell phone companies wanted.In fact, Carlo found a strong connection
between cell phone use and brain tumours, neurological disease and genetic
damage.The scientific evidence is
mounting daily.Brain cancer is up 25%
since cell phones became popular.Every
year there are 183,000 more cases in the USA alone.And this may just be the beginning.Like smoking and lead poisoning, the damage
from electro pollution is cumulative and may take years, even decades to reveal
itself.But every exposure may adversely
effect your health.Several renowned
neuro-surgeons now believe radiation from cell phones and other mobile devices
are directly related to the 21% increase in brain tumours in children.Children and teenagers are at greatest risk
from electro pollution damage, because their skulls are thinner, they have more
brain fluid and their bodies are not fully developed.How much time does your child spend on the
cell phone every day?And how will the
constant barrage of electro magnetic radiation from cell phone use effect your
child’s’ health in five years, ten years, twenty or more years?
The effects of cell phone radiation on a rats brain
In a recent study
neuro-surgeons at LundUniversity in Sweden proved conclusively a link
between radiation from cell phones and brain damage. The researchers attached cell phones to the
cages of rats and exposed them to intermittent electro magnetic radiation for
only two hours, emulating typical cell phone use. Fifty days after that single two hour
exposure, the rat’s brain showed significant blood vessel leakage, as well as
areas of shrunken, damaged neurons.
Researchers concluded that if human brains are similarly effected, the
damage could produce long term mental deficiencies. And in 2004, respected scientists in Sweden proved
for the first time, a definitive human link between cell phone use and benign
brain tumours, located exactly where the patients held their cell phones.
Dr Sheldon Levy, a
respected physician and surgeon has studied the effects of EMF radiation, “I
have to tell you, it’s hard to ignore the data.
You must consider the long term risks of cell phone use. If indeed the effects are cumulative, then
young people who are using cell phones at such an early stage of their
development, run a particularly high risk”.
But cell phones
aren’t the only culprit. Scientists have
become increasingly concerned about the potential risks involved in exposure to
low level microwave radiation from microwave ovens. Keep in mind, like all forms or radiation,
you may not see or feel the microwaves that escape your microwave oven, but
don’t underestimate the power of this insidious form of electro pollution. Just think, it only takes about a minute to
boil a cup of water in a microwave oven; disconcerting when you consider the
human brain is 90% water.
Certain body organs
are particularly sensitive to this thermal effect or heat, generated by
invisible microwaves; your stomach, intestines and bladder are especially
sensitive to thermal damage from high levels of microwaves, EMF’s and electro
magnetic radiation. Likewise, the testes
are very sensitive to changes in temperature.
Exposure to high levels of microwave energy can alter or kill sperm, producing
temporary sterility. According to one
study, men who kept their cell phones in their pockets experienced a 35%
reduction in sperm count.
And there is no
escaping this invisible menace. Electro
pollution is not limited to cell phones and microwave ovens. Home computers, laptops, cordless phones,
televisions, refrigerators, hairdryers, coffee makers, even our cars add to the
daily accumulation of electro pollution and may be pushing us closer to a
national health crisis.
Do you or children
use a laptop computer or a video game console?
Do you use these devices on your lap?
Consider this: scientists are exploring the connection between the EMF’s
from the electronic devices we use on our laps and the astounding 50% increase in
testicular cancer over the past twenty years. One important study
in the USA,
found as link between those who work in an environment with high EMF exposure
and neuro degenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s
disease and Lou Gehrigs disease.
But it’s not just
about diseases. Research shows that
continual exposure to this onslaught of electro pollution, disrupts your
natural energy levels, triggering an adrenal response which in turn increases
stress responses. This constant stress
contributes to your energy depletion and fatigue, lack of concentration, poor
work performance and difficulty getting a good nights sleep.
Dr Sheldon Levy
told us, “Based on the research that I’ve reviewed, I’m convinced that the
chronic exposure to electro magnetic frequencies, plays some role in the
dramatic increase in stress related diseases and conditions that we’ve been
seeing”.
If electro
pollution is so dangerous, why doesn’t the government step in and do something
about it? Government officials will
tell you that the studies are inconclusive, that they’re waiting for long term
human studies to prove that cell phones, which bombard us continually with radiation,
are truly harmful.
Can you afford to
wait? Are you willing to put your health
and the health of your loved ones on the line, while the government spends
years confirming what so many respected scientists already consider an
international health crisis?
The Swiss government and the World Health Organisation share the largest microwave research studies and some of these studies are showing adverse effects. But what has the Swiss government learned about WiFi that we are unaware of?
Cell phone radiation is mainly limited to the duration of the call. However, if you live close to cell phone towers you are exposed to constant microwave radiation from the antennas.
This high level of radiation can also be found in our homes, generated by cordless phones, cordless baby monitors and WiFi base stations. Dr Magda Havas shows us the EMF radiation created by these consumer electronics.